{"id":16728,"date":"2026-06-25T12:12:51","date_gmt":"2026-06-25T17:12:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.voicesforvaccines.org\/?post_type=jtf_topics&#038;p=16728"},"modified":"2026-06-25T12:16:59","modified_gmt":"2026-06-25T17:16:59","slug":"are-vaccines-at-two-months-tied-to-death","status":"publish","type":"jtf_topics","link":"https:\/\/www.voicesforvaccines.org\/es\/jtf_topics\/are-vaccines-at-two-months-tied-to-death\/","title":{"rendered":"Are vaccines at two months tied to death?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wpb-content-wrapper\">[vc_row source=&#8221;&#8221; text=&#8221;Clinical Trials&#8221; font_container=&#8221;tag:h2|text_align:left&#8221; use_theme_fonts=&#8221;yes&#8221; google_fonts=&#8221;font_family:Abril%20Fatface%3Aregular|font_style:400%20regular%3A400%3Anormal&#8221; link=&#8221;&#8221; css=&#8221;.vc_custom_1708910874436{border-top-width: 1px !important;border-right-width: 1px !important;border-bottom-width: 1px !important;border-left-width: 1px !important;}&#8221;][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_custom_heading text=&#8221;The Claim:&#8221; font_container=&#8221;tag:h3|text_align:left&#8221; use_theme_fonts=&#8221;yes&#8221;][vc_column_text css=&#8221;&#8221;]Peter McCullough\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/NicHulscher\/status\/2068714075601666218?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\">group<\/a>\u00a0claims that Louisiana records show vaccinated two-month-old babies are 112% more likely to die.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_custom_heading text=&#8221;The Facts:&#8221; font_container=&#8221;tag:h3|text_align:left&#8221; use_theme_fonts=&#8221;yes&#8221;][vc_column_text css=&#8221;&#8221;]The claim seems to come from a paper by Karl Jablonowski and Brian Hooker of Children\u2019s Health Defense, titled\u00a0<em data-end=\"1785\" data-start=\"1716\">I<a href=\"https:\/\/www.preprints.org\/manuscript\/202512.1865\" rel=\"nofollow\">ncreased Mortality Associated with 2-Month Old Infant Vaccinations<\/a><\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.preprints.org\/manuscript\/202512.1865\">.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The paper was a preprint, which means it was shared online before other scientists carefully checked it for mistakes. In peer review, experts look at a study\u2019s methods, data, and conclusions to see if they are strong and fair.<\/p>\n<p>This paper was not peer reviewed. Instead, the paper was posted on Preprints.org in December 2025, but it was removed from the website in January 2026. After it was removed, the authors uploaded it\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/zenodo.org\/records\/18262931\" rel=\"nofollow\">somewhere else<\/a>. When you look closely at how the authors studied the numbers, there are some big problems.<\/p>\n<p>First, they do not explain the medical reasons that the children died. Without knowing what caused\u00a0the children&#8217;s deaths, there is no way to know whether vaccines had anything to do with them.<\/p>\n<p>Second, they used a very narrow definition of \u201cvaccinated.\u201d This means they counted children as vaccinated only during a short period. They ignored children who got vaccines before or after that time period. That can make the results misleading because it leaves out a lot of information.<\/p>\n<p>Third, there are problems with their confidence intervals, which are ranges of numbers scientists use to show how sure or unsure they are about a result. Their confidence intervals cross over 0. When a confidence interval crosses 0, it usually means the result could have happened by random chance. In science, this is called not statistically significant.\u00a0Their results are not strong enough to say\u00a0that it probably did not happen by chance. In other words, it could be a coincidence.<\/p>\n<p>The authors do not clearly explain this problem, even though it undermines everything they say in the paper.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Children&#8217;s Health Defense paper claiming vaccinated 2-month-olds die more often was never peer reviewed and has multiple methodological flaws.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"parent":0,"template":"","jtf_topic_subjects":[319,199,333,305,386,296,218,280],"class_list":["post-16728","jtf_topics","type-jtf_topics","status-publish","hentry","jtf_topic_subjects-brian-hooker","jtf_topic_subjects-childhood-vaccines","jtf_topic_subjects-childrens-health-defense","jtf_topic_subjects-infants","jtf_topic_subjects-karl-jablonowski","jtf_topic_subjects-peter-mccullough","jtf_topic_subjects-vaccine-safety","jtf_topic_subjects-vaccine-schedules","entry","no-media"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voicesforvaccines.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jtf_topics\/16728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voicesforvaccines.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jtf_topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voicesforvaccines.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/jtf_topics"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.voicesforvaccines.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jtf_topics\/16728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16730,"href":"https:\/\/www.voicesforvaccines.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jtf_topics\/16728\/revisions\/16730"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.voicesforvaccines.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"jtf_topic_subjects","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.voicesforvaccines.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/jtf_topic_subjects?post=16728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}